Social Reporting

Bev Trayner has been thinking about reporting socially (let’s NOT call it Reporting 2.0 please, tempting though it may be!), developing one of David Wilcox’s great ideas. She contrasts the formally constructed semblance-of-authority-and-completeness report with David Wilcox’s idea of social reporting as capturing “stuff” (ie the powerpoints and handouts), “stories” (ie what people think about the matter) and “conversations” (ie how people interact around the matter). She has some nice suggestions for why this might be useful:

”* Keeping a shared memory of “what happened” through more than one people doing it, often in quite random ways, and brought together by tags;

Some of the characteristics of social reporting are that it’s informal, visual, and it doesn’t present itself as an accurate representation of the truth – but, rather, as perspectives from different places and angles.”

I can see this working beautifully for participative events and maybe even collective journeys. I like the way that ease of capture starts to become a factor, how even the composition of the “social reports” can become a collaborative, emergent thing. I like the way that it leaves space for the more formally-composed traditional reports to spring from the resources created by the social report while leaving their evidence visible and explicit. I’m sure Dave Snowden’s Sensemaker software could be laid over the top of this for larger scale sensemaking and pattern analysis. Lovely stuff.

0 Comment so far

Post a comment

Name:

Email:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Comment Guidelines: Basic XHTML is allowed (<strong>, <em>, <a>) Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically generated. URLs are automatically converted into links.